A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they had been meant to Assemble Visible evidence on the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water during intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the location became one of the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second from the lawful timeline.
At the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as created, goes over and above what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting instead that it is about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've described René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 their prolonged-standing link to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only wanting to produce a loved ones household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one is effective are already performed depending on Expert advice and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into The ocean for the duration of a storm, do not change the fundamental info.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute above construction of wall at coastal web site has become a shorthand description for the circumstance a large number of observers see as significantly typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming a lot more contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier noted the businessman experienced previously been involved with area advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very distinct Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded through midsection-high water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting each the Actual physical fact from the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive approach.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result remains uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human element remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living together with one another extended following the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend past that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.